- No use or way of assessing 7 survival skills on standardized state tests.
- Science and math knowledge doesn't really affect lifelong success.
- People who support NCLB say that there is proven fact that taking high level math or science classes results in better success in life.
- What they did not factor in is the fact that a correlation between two things does NOT give a cause and affect relationship.
- Example: Ice cream leads to more drownings. (In reality, ice cream and drowning have something in common, most likely it is summer out which is why a person would be swimming and they are having ice cream. Two correlated things that I just used to "prove" cause and affect.)
- The NCLB law affects students pointlessly, it assesses students using multiple choice, which is pointless because it doesn't require you to think.
- There are good test that do assess some of the 7 survival skills
- Open-ended questions and tests that require you to explain your reasoning for giving that answer.
- Open-ended tests cost a lot more money than standardized tests that use multiple choice
- It is easier to give multiple choice because it is easier to correct.
- AP classes are rigourous.
- But only for tests, it is all to get you ready to take a test.
In the past two years, I have been writing on this as I have prepared to become a special education teacher. Now, I venture forth to actually become a special education teacher. My journeys and lessons that I have learned will be documented.
Thursday, December 2, 2010
Global Achievement Gap- Chapter 3: Testing 1 2 3
Question: To what extent do the state tests assess the skills that mattert most for work, citizenship and college?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment